Two-Stage Patent Races and Patent Policy, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.31, issue.3, pp.488-501, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2600997
How should forward patent protection be provided?, Article 52 of the European Patent Convention states that computer, pp.801-827, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-7187(01)00080-7
Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions, NBER Working Papers, vol.8807, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.3386/w8807
Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in, Biomedical Research Science, vol.280, pp.5364-698, 1998. ,
Nonobviousness and the Incentive to Innovate: An Economic Analysis of Intellecual Property Reform, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper, p.99, 1995. ,
The US Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process, Research Policy, vol.29, pp.531-557, 2000. ,
Rational Ignorance at the Patent O¢ ce, pp.1497-1532, 2001. ,
On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope, Columbia Law Review, vol.90, issue.4, pp.839-916, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1122920
A Patentability Requirement for Sequential Innovation, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.29, issue.4, pp.654-679, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2556088
Patent Breadth, Patent Life, and the Pace of Technological Progress, Journal of Economics <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Management Strategy, vol.44, issue.4, pp.1-32, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1086/261070
Novelty and Disclosure in Patent Law, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.21, issue.1, pp.131-146, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2555499
Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross-Licenses, Patent- Pools, and Standard-Setting, Innovation Policy and the Economy, pp.119-150, 2001. ,