Why are good comparative studies of networks so rare? Practical lessons from a study on French clusters - Mines Paris Accéder directement au contenu
Autre Publication Année : 2010

Why are good comparative studies of networks so rare? Practical lessons from a study on French clusters

Thierry Weil
Anna Glaser
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 871687
Valérie Mérindol
  • Fonction : Auteur
Philippe Lefebvre
Frédérique Pallez

Résumé

French “competitiveness clusters” were set up in 2005 to strengthen cooperation between small and large enterprises, and training and research institutions working on similar topics and located in the same geographical area, with the aim of making this area more competitive and attractive through enhanced innovation. Our analysis of this set of about 70 apparently similar networks, on which much data were collected, has given us an opportunity to investigate the factors explaining the differences in their performance.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
CWP_2010-08.pdf (435.65 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00488404 , version 1 (01-06-2010)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-00488404 , version 1

Citer

Thierry Weil, Anna Glaser, Emilie-Pauline Gallié, Valérie Mérindol, Philippe Lefebvre, et al.. Why are good comparative studies of networks so rare? Practical lessons from a study on French clusters. 2010. ⟨hal-00488404⟩
255 Consultations
481 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More