K. Akimoto, F. Sano, T. Homma, J. Oda, M. Nagashima et al., Estimates of GHG emission reduction potential by country, sector, and cost. Energy Policy, Large-scale wind power in electricity markets with Regular Papers, pp.3384-3393, 2010.

2. Alacero, América Latina en cifras -Asociación Latinoamericana del Acero

S. Arango and E. R. Larsen, The environmental paradox in generation: How South America is gradually becoming more dependent on thermal generation, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol.14, issue.9, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.049

E. Y. Arima, P. Barreto, E. Araújo, and B. Soares-filho, Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: Lessons and challenges from Brazil, Land Use Policy, vol.41, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.026

G. P. Asner, D. E. Knapp, R. E. Martin, R. Tupayachi, C. B. Anderson et al., Targeted carbon conservation at national scales with highresolution monitoring, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 2014.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.1419550111

A. M. Bassi and A. E. Baer, Quantifying cross-sectoral impacts of investments in climate change mitigation in Ecuador, Energy for Sustainable Development, vol.13, issue.2, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.esd.2009.05.003

B. S. Borba, A. F. Lucena, R. Rathmann, I. V. Costa, L. P. Nogueira et al., Energy-related climate change mitigation in Brazil: Potential, abatement costs and associated policies, Special Section: Fuel Poverty Comes of Age: Commemorating 21 Years of Research and Policy, pp.430-441, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.040

M. Buizer, D. Humphreys, and W. De-jong, Climate change and deforestation: The evolution of an intersecting policy domain Climate change and deforestation: the evolution of an intersecting policy domain 35, Environ. Sci. Policy, 2014.

J. D. Colgan, Oil, Domestic Politics, and International Conflict, Energy Research & Social Science, vol.1, pp.198-205, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.005

D. Sbroiavacca, N. Nadal, G. Lallana, F. Falzon, J. Calvin et al., Emissions reduction scenarios in the Argentinean Energy Sector, Energy Economics, vol.56, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.021

D. Sbroiavacca, N. Nadal, G. Lallana, F. Falzon, J. Calvin et al., Emissions reduction scenarios in the Argentinean Energy Sector, Energy Economics, vol.56, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.021

A. Dolezal, A. M. Majano, A. Ochs, and R. Palencia, The Way Forward for Renewable Energy in Central America. ECLAC, 2014. The economics of climate change in Latin America and the Caribbean: Paradoxes and challenges, 2013.

E. Nielsen, A. S. Plantinga, A. J. Alig, and R. J. , Mitigating climate change through afforestation: New cost estimates for the United States, Empresa de pesquisa energética. European Commission, 2014. Sixth national Communication from the European Union under the UNFCCC. European Commission, pp.83-98, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.11.001

F. Bariloche, Argentina: Diagnóstico, prospectivas y lineamiento para definir estrategias posibles ante el Cambio Climático, 2008.

J. Goldemberg, R. Schaeffer, A. Szklo, and R. Lucchesi, Oil and natural gas prospects in South America: Can the petroleum industry pave the way for renewables in Brazil?, Energy Policy, vol.64, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.064

J. J. Gonzalez-arenas, A. A. Etter-rothlisberger, A. H. Sarmiento-lópez, and S. A. Orrego-suaza, Análisis de tendencias y patrones espaciales de deforestación en Colombia, 2011.

A. F. Hof, M. G. Den-elzen, and M. Roelfsema, The effect of updated pledges and business-as-usual projections, and new agreed rules on expected global greenhouse gas emissions in 2020, Environmental Science & Policy, vol.33, pp.308-319, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.06.007

D. Hoornweg and P. Bhada-tata, What a Waste -A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. The World Bank, 2012.

M. Labriet, L. Drouet, M. Vielle, R. Loulou, A. Kanudia et al., Assessment of the Effectiveness of Global Climate Policies Using Coupled Bottom-Up and Top-Down Models, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2580216

A. Lahsen, J. Rojas, D. Morata, and D. Aravena, Geothermal Exploration in Chile: Country Update, Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015, pp.19-24, 2015.

R. Loulou and M. Labriet, ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model Part I: Model structure, Computational Management Science, vol.42, issue.2, pp.7-40, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10287-007-0046-z

R. Loulou, U. Remme, A. Kanudia, A. Lehtila, and G. Goldstein, Documentation for the TIMES model: Part I. Energy Technol, 2005.

A. F. Lucena, L. Clarke, R. Schaeffer, A. Szklo, P. R. Rochedo et al., Climate policy scenarios in Brazil: A multi-model comparison for energy, Energy Economics, vol.56, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.02.005

S. Margulis, C. B. Dubeux, and J. Marcovitch, The Economics of Climate Change in Brazil: Costs and Opportunities, 2011.

H. D. Matthews, T. L. Graham, S. Keverian, C. Lamontagne, D. Seto et al., National contributions to observed global warming, Environmental Research Letters, vol.9, issue.1, pp.10-1088, 2014.
DOI : 10.1088/1748-9326/9/1/014010
URL : http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/1/014010

. Mmaya, Segunda Comunicacion del estado plurinacional de Bolivia ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Agua -Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, 2009.

J. R. Moreira, S. A. Pacca, and V. Parente, The future of oil and bioethanol in Brazil, Energy Policy, vol.65, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.055

D. Nepstad, B. S. Soares-filho, F. Merry, A. Lima, P. Moutinho et al., The End of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, Science, vol.326, issue.5958, pp.1350-1351, 2009.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1182108

K. P. Overmars, E. Stehfest, A. Tabeau, H. Van-meijl, A. M. Beltrán et al., Estimating the opportunity costs of reducing carbon dioxide emissions via avoided deforestation, using integrated assessment modelling, Land Use Policy, vol.41, pp.45-60, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.015

L. Pellegrini, M. Arsel, F. Falconí, and R. Muradian, The demise of a new conservation and development policy? Exploring the tensions of the Yasun?? ITT initiative, The Extractive Industries and Society, vol.1, issue.2, pp.284-291, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.exis.2014.05.001

S. Postic, Long-term energy prospective modeling for South America -Application to international climate negotiations, MINES ParisTech, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01303955

O. Ricci and S. Selosse, Global and regional potential for bioelectricity with carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy, Special Section: Transition Pathways to a Low Carbon Economy 52, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.027
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01135637

E. Riegelhaupt and T. A. Chalico, Opportunities and challenges for biofuel production in Latin America: a forester's perspective, 2009.

. Sayds, Segunda Comunicación Nacional de la República Argentina a la convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre Cambio Climático, Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable -República Argentina. SEAM, 2011. Segunda Comunicación Nacional -Cambio Climático. Secretaria de Ambiente -Presidencia de la República del Paraguay, 2007.

E. Smeets, A. Faaij, I. Lewandowski, and W. Turkenburg, A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol.33, issue.1, pp.56-106, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.pecs.2006.08.001

N. Stern, The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, 2007.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511817434

S. Syri, A. Lehtilä, T. Ekholm, I. Savolainen, H. Holttinen et al., Global energy and emissions scenarios for effective climate change mitigation???Deterministic and stochastic scenarios with the TIAM model, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol.2, pp.274-285, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.01.001

M. C. Vallejo, R. Burbano, F. Falconí, and C. Larrea, Leaving oil underground in Ecuador: The Yasun??-ITT initiative from a multi-criteria perspective, Ecological Economics, vol.109, pp.175-185, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.013

B. C. Van-der-zwaan, K. V. Calvin, and L. E. Clarke, Climate Mitigation in Latin America: Implications for Energy and Land Use, Energy Economics, vol.56, pp.495-498, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.05.005

B. J. Van-ruijven, K. Daenzer, K. Fisher-vanden, T. Kober, S. Paltsev et al., Baseline projections for Latin America: base-year assumptions, key drivers and greenhouse emissions, Energy Economics, vol.56, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.02.003

J. Veysey, C. Octaviano, K. Calvin, S. H. Martinez, A. Kitous et al., Pathways to Mexico???s climate change mitigation targets: A multi-model analysis, Energy Economics, vol.56, pp.587-599, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.011

E. No, N. To, and . Unfccc, National voluntary targets: - 82% oil in primary energy 14 . - 80% of hydropower in national electricity. - 90% renewable Elec. Target year = 2020. Sectorial targets. Target year = 2025. Reference indicators: national BAU. Unilateral targets: - -25% GHG from energy. - Reforestation of 1,300,000 hectares. Conditional targets: - -37, p.0

. Economy-wide, Target year = 2025 Reference emissions: historical (2010) Unilateral target: -30% GHG emissions. Indicative target: -40% GHG emissions by, 2030.

. Economy-wide, Target year = 2030 Reference emissions: national BAU

. Sectorial, Target year = 2030 Reference emissions: national BAU Unilateral target: -5% GHG emissions in energy, AFOLU, waste Conditional target: -25% GHG emissions in energy, AFOLU, waste 14 Down from 92%, 2010.