A. E. Addae, Pathways to Sector Selection: A Conceptual Framework for Social Entrepreneurs, 2013.

J. C. Anjier, Anti-Takeover Statutes, Shareholders, Stakeholders and Risk, La. L. Rev, vol.51, p.561, 1990.

B. Armendáriz and A. Szafarz, On mission drift in microfinance institutions The handbook of microfinance 341, p.366, 2011.

A. Ashta and M. Hudon, The Compartamos microfinance IPO: Mission conflicts in hybrid institutions with diverse shareholding, Strategic Change, vol.76, issue.6, pp.7-8, 2012.
DOI : 10.1002/jsc.1912

S. C. Bacq, F. Janssen, and J. R. , Governing for Impact and Performance within Social Entrepreneurial Ventures: The Mediating Role of Organizational Capabilities, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp.31-32, 2011.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2557493

S. M. Bainbridge, Interpreting Nonshareholder Constituency Statutes, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.19, p.971, 1991.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.310261

URL : http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1642&context=plr

S. M. Bainbridge, The Business Judgment Rule as Abstention Doctrine, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.57, p.83, 2004.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.429260

J. Battilana and S. Dorado, Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations, Academy of Management Journal, vol.53, issue.6, pp.1419-1440, 2010.
DOI : 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391

J. Battilana and M. Lee, Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing ??? Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises, The Academy of Management Annals, vol.8, issue.1, pp.397-441, 2014.
DOI : 10.1080/19416520.2014.893615

J. Battilana, M. Lee, J. Walker, and C. Dorsey, In search of the hybrid ideal, Stanford Social Innovation Review, vol.10, issue.3, pp.50-55, 2012.

M. L. Besharov and W. K. Smith, Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications, Academy of Management Review, vol.39, issue.3, pp.364-381, 2014.
DOI : 10.5465/amr.2011.0431

R. P. Christen and T. Cook, Commercialization and mission drift: the transformation of microfinance in Latin America, Consultative group to assist the poorest (CGAP), 2001.

C. Jr, W. H. , and E. K. Babson, How Benefit Corporations are redefining the purpose of business corporations, Wm. Mitchell L. Rev, vol.38, p.817, 2011.

W. H. Clark and L. Vranka, White Paper : The need and rationale for the benefit corporation: whi it is the legal form that best addreses the needs of social entrepreneurs, investors and ultimately the public, 2013.

J. G. Dees, Enterprising nonprofits, Harvard business review, vol.76, pp.54-69, 1998.

J. G. Dees and B. B. Anderson, Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding and contributing to an emerging field, pp.39-66, 2006.

J. Defourny and M. Nyssens, Defining Social Enterprise At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society, In Social Enterprise, 2006.

J. Defourny and M. Nyssens, Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, vol.61, issue.1, pp.32-53, 2010.
DOI : 10.1057/9780230625655

A. Ebrahim, J. Battilana, and J. Mair, The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations, Research in Organizational Behavior, vol.34, pp.81-100, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001

J. Fishman, The development of nonprofit corporation law and an agenda for reform, Emory Law Journal, vol.34, 1985.

M. Friedman, The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, 1970.

J. Galaskiewicz and S. N. Barringer, Social enterprises and social categories Social enterprises: An organizational perspective, pp.47-80, 2012.

K. Greenfield, The Failure of Corporate Law: Fundamental Flaws and Progressive Possibilities Chicago, 2008.
DOI : 10.7208/chicago/9780226306988.001.0001

S. Hai and R. L. Daft, When missions collide, Organizational Dynamics, vol.45, issue.4, pp.283-290, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.10.003

N. Haigh and A. J. Hoffman, Hybrid organizations, Organizational Dynamics, vol.41, issue.2, pp.126-134, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.006

O. Handlin and M. F. Handlin, Origins of the American Business Corporation, The Journal of Economic History, vol.I, issue.01, pp.1-23, 1945.
DOI : 10.1017/S0022050700112318

G. Hsu, M. T. Hannan, and Ö. Koçak, Multiple Category Memberships in Markets: An Integrative Theory and Two Empirical Tests, American Sociological Review, vol.108, issue.1, pp.150-169, 2009.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203361832

J. Jay, Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations, Academy of Management Journal, vol.56, issue.1, pp.137-159, 2012.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2010.0772

D. Jones and W. Keogh, Social enterprise: a case of terminological ambiguity and complexity, Social Enterprise Journal, vol.2, issue.1, pp.11-26, 2006.
DOI : 10.1108/17508610680000710

A. Keay, Moving Towards Stakeholderism? Constituency Statutes, Enlightened Shareholder Value, and More: Much Ado About Little?, European Business Law Review, vol.22, issue.1, pp.1-49, 2011.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1530990

T. A. Kelley, Law and Choice of Entity on the Social Enterprise Frontier, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1372313

J. A. Kerlin, Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and Learning from the Differences, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, vol.2, issue.3, pp.246-262, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11266-006-9016-2

M. Kohn, Business Organization in Pre-Industrial Europe, Draft chapter of The Origins of Western Economic Success: Commerce, Finance, and Government in Pre- Industrial Europe, 2003.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.427744

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

M. Kornhauser, Corporate Regulation and the Origins of the Corporate Income Tax, Indiana Law Journal, vol.66, p.53, 1990.

M. Lee and J. Battilana, How the Zebra Got its Stripes: Imprinting of Individuals and Hybrid Social Ventures, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp.1-50, 2013.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2291686

M. Cormac, S. , and H. Haney, New Corporate Forms: One Viable Solution to Advancing Environmental Sustainability, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, vol.24, issue.2, 2012.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2012.00378.x

J. R. Macey, State Anti-Takeover Legislation and the National Economy, Wis. L. Rev, p.467, 1988.

J. Mackey, What Conscious Capitalism Really is, California Management Review, vol.53, issue.3, pp.83-90, 2011.
DOI : 10.1525/cmr.2011.53.3.83

J. Mair, J. Mayer, and E. Lutz, Navigating Institutional Plurality: Organizational Governance in Hybrid Organizations, Organization Studies, vol.15, issue.2, pp.713-739, 2015.
DOI : 10.1086/210178

URL : http://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1308098/document.pdf

J. Mclean, Transnational Corporation in History: Lessons for Today, The, Ind. LJ, vol.79, p.363, 2004.

R. Mersland and R. Ø. Strøm, Microfinance Mission Drift?, World Development, vol.38, issue.1, pp.28-36, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.006

URL : https://oda.hio.no/jspui/bitstream/10642/449/2/523226post.pdf

S. Munch, Improving the Benefit Corporation: How Traditional Governance Mechanisms Can Enhance the Innovative New Business Form, Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy, vol.7, issue.1, 2012.

J. H. Murray and E. I. Hwang, Purpose with Profit: Governance, Enforcement, Capital-Raising and Capital-Locking in Low-Profit Limited Liability Companies, University of Miami Law Review, vol.66, issue.1, 2011.

E. W. Orts, Beyond Shareholders: Interpreting Corporate Constituency Statutes, George Washington Law Review, vol.14, issue.1, pp.14-135, 1992.

A. C. Pache and F. Santos, Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics, Academy of Management Journal, vol.56, issue.4, pp.972-1001, 2012.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2011.0405

A. Page and R. Katz, Freezing Out Ben & Jerry: Corporate Law and the Sale of a Social Enterprise Icon, Vt. L. Rev, vol.35, p.211, 2010.

A. Plerhoples, Can an Old Dog Learn New Tricks? Applying Traditional Corporate Law Principles to New Social Enterprise Legislation, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2010808

URL : http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2023&context=facpub

C. Prior, S. R. Cohen, and T. Fox, Profit-with-Purpose Businesses -Subject paper of the Mission Alignment Working Group, 2014.

H. Rawhouser, M. E. Cummings, and A. Crane, Benefit Corporation Legislation and the Emergence of a Social Hybrid Category, California Management Review, vol.57, issue.3, 2015.
DOI : 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.13

D. B. Reiser, Benefit Corporations-A Sustainable Form of Organization, Wake Forest L. Rev, vol.46, pp.591-867, 2011.

D. B. Reiser and D. B. Reiser, Next Big Thing: Flexible Purpose Corporations, TheTheorizing Forms of Social Enterprise, EMORY LAW JOURNAL, vol.62, p.681, 2012.

H. Sabeti, The emerging fourth sector, Report. Washington, DC and Aspen, 2009.

H. Sabeti, The For-Benefit Enterprise, Harvard Business Review, vol.89, issue.11, pp.98-104, 2011.

L. S. Sealy, The Director As Trustee, The Cambridge Law Journal, vol.25, issue.01, p.83, 1967.
DOI : 10.1017/S0008197300011223

J. Tyler, Negating the Legal Problem of Having " Two Masters " : A Framework for L3C Fiduciary Duties and Accountability, Vt. L. Rev, vol.35, p.117, 2010.

J. Veldman, The corporate condition, 2011.

S. Williston, History of the Law of Business Corporations before 1800. I, Harvard Law Review, vol.2, issue.3, pp.105-124, 1888.
DOI : 10.2307/1322201

D. G. Yosifon, The Law of Corporate Purpose, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.10, pp.181-230, 2014.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2154031