F. Aiuti, C. Baroni, A. Cao, and A. Et-fantoni, Academic promotion in Italy, Academic promotion in Italy, p.1337, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92640-N

É. Archambault and V. Et-larivière, History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences, Scientometrics, vol.132, issue.3435, pp.635-649, 2009.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.461d

J. Bar-ilan, Which h-index? ??? A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar, Scientometrics, vol.1, issue.1, pp.257-271, 2007.
DOI : 10.5860/crl.67.2.106

J. Bar-ilan, Citations to the ???Introduction to informetrics??? indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar, Scientometrics, vol.34, issue.4, pp.495-506, 2010.
DOI : 10.5860/crl.67.2.106

J. Bollen, M. A. Rodriquez, and H. Van-de-sompel, Journal status, Journal status, pp.669-687, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11192-006-0176-z
URL : https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11192-006-0176-z.pdf

G. C. Bowker and S. L. Star, Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences, 1999.

J. F. Burnham, Scopus database: a review, Biomedical Digital Libraries, vol.3, issue.1, pp.1-8, 2006.
DOI : 10.1186/1742-5581-3-1
URL : http://bio-diglib.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1?site=bio-diglib.biomedcentral.com

D. Cardon and . Esprit-du-pagerank, Une enquête sur l'algorithme de Google, pp.63-95, 2013.

B. Cronin and C. R. Et-sugimoto, Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators at scholarly impact, 2014.

L. M. Fabbri, « Rank injustice and academic promotion », The Lancet, p.860, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91051-8

M. E. Falagas, E. I. Pitsouni, G. A. Malietzis, and G. Pappas, Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses, Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses, pp.338-342, 2008.
DOI : 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF

S. Gardner and S. Et-eng, Gaga over Google? Scholar in the Social Sciences, Library Hi Tech News, vol.22, issue.8, pp.42-45, 2005.
DOI : 10.1108/07419050510633952

E. Garfield and I. H. Et-sher, New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing, American Documentation, vol.131, issue.3, pp.195-201, 1963.
DOI : 10.1108/eb026315

E. Garfield, Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?, Scientometrics, vol.2, issue.No. 4, pp.359-375, 1979.
DOI : 10.1109/TEM.1971.6448353

J. Giles, Start your engines, Nature, vol.239, issue.7068, pp.554-555, 2005.
DOI : 10.1126/science.2448875

P. L. Gross and E. M. Et-gross, COLLEGE LIBRARIES AND CHEMICAL EDUCATION, Science, vol.66, issue.1713, pp.385-389, 1713.
DOI : 10.1126/science.66.1713.385

K. Gunnarsdóttir, Scientific Journal Publications, Social Studies of Science, vol.34, issue.3, pp.549-579, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01553188

D. Hicks, The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences, Scientometrics, vol.41, issue.1???2, pp.193-215, 1999.
DOI : 10.1093/rev/7.1.2

J. E. Hirsch, An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pp.16569-16572, 2005.
DOI : 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018543.82441.f1
URL : http://www.pnas.org/content/102/46/16569.full.pdf

S. Karlsson and T. Et-krichel, « RePEc and S-WoPEc: Internet access to electronic preprints in economics, Electronic publishing' 99, 1999.

P. Lavie, The race for the impact factor, Journal of Sleep Research, vol.16, issue.3, pp.283-284, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00778.x

L. I. Meho and K. Yang, « A new era in citation and bibliometric analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, 2006.

M. J. Moravcsik, Strengthening the coverage of the third world science, National Science Foundation, 1985.

F. Narin, Evaluative bibliometrics: the use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity, Cherry Hill, 1976.

L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd, « The Pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web, pp.1-17, 1999.

D. Pontille and D. Et-torny, The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities, Research evaluation, pp.347-360, 2010.
DOI : 10.3152/095820210X12809191250889
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00568746

D. Pontille and D. Et-torny, La manufacture de??l'??valuation??scientifique, R??seaux, vol.177, issue.1, pp.25-61, 2013.
DOI : 10.3917/res.177.0023

D. Pontille and D. Et-torny, « From manuscript evaluation to article valuation: The changing technologies of, Journal Peer Review » Human Studies, vol.38, issue.1, pp.57-79, 2015.

L. M. Raisig, Mathematical Evaluation of the Scientific Serial, Science, vol.131, issue.3411, pp.1417-1419, 1960.
DOI : 10.1126/science.131.3411.1417

M. Rossner, E. Hill, and H. Et-van-epps, Show me the data, Show me the data, pp.1091-1092, 2007.
DOI : 10.1038/35057062

G. Taubes, Measure for measure in science, Science, vol.260, issue.5110, pp.884-886, 1993.
DOI : 10.1126/science.8493516

R. Van-noorden, Metrics: A profusion of measures, Nature, vol.435, issue.7300, pp.864-866, 2010.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0006022

P. Weingart, Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?, Scientometrics, vol.62, issue.1, pp.117-131, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7

P. Wouters, The Citation Culture, Ph.D. thesis, Amsterdam, Université d'Amsterdam (en ligne : http://dare.uva.nl/search? Notes, pp.101-769, 1999.